Prediction of Myriam Casanova vs Kirsten Flipkens Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Casanova vs K. Flipkens

Myriam Casanova

SUI

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.72m

Height

1.65m

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

$3.1M

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Kirsten Flipkens

BEL

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.72m

Height

1.65m

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

$3.1M

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Head-to-head: Casanova 1 - 0 Flipkens

They have played 2 sets in total, with Myriam Casanova winning 2 and Kirsten Flipkens winning 0. The last match between Myriam Casanova and Kirsten Flipkens was at the Proximus Diamond Games - Antwerp, 10-02-2003, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Myriam Casanova getting the victory 6-2 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Casanova	1
Flipkens	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Proximus Diamond Games - Antwerp(02-10-03)

Stats

Myriam Casanova

Kirsten Flipkens

M. Casanova vs K. Flipkens H2H Profile

M. Casanova	Stats	K. Flipkens
$0	Career Prize Money	$3,051,580
62.76% (91-54)	Career Total W/L	56.19% (495-386)
1	Indoor	0
4	Titles	12
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Casanova vs K. Flipkens Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Myriam Casanova has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Kirsten Flipkens has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Myriam Casanova, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kirsten Flipkens has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Myriam Casanova has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kirsten Flipkens has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Myriam Casanova has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Kirsten Flipkens winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Myriam Casanova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 41/20), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 16/14). Kirsten Flipkens has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 68/40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 180/146).
Player level: In the last year, Myriam Casanova has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Kirsten Flipkens has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Myriam Casanova winning 1 times and Kirsten Flipkens being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Myriam Casanova winning 2 and Kirsten Flipkens winning 0.
The last match between Myriam Casanova and Kirsten Flipkens was at the Proximus Diamond Games - Antwerp, 10-02-2003, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Myriam Casanova getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Myriam Casanova has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Kirsten Flipkens has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Myriam Casanova has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kirsten Flipkens has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Myriam Casanova has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kirsten Flipkens has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Myriam Casanova vs Kirsten Flipkens Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Casanova vs K. Flipkens H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Casanova	Stats	K. Flipkens
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	7
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Casanova Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Maribor - 30-05-2011
Q2 Teresa MalikovaT. Malikova	L	6-2 3-6 6-1	Stats
Velenje - 23-05-2011
R1 Azra HadzicA. Hadzic	W	6-1 6-1	Stats
R2 Martina BoreckaM. Borecka	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Cagnes-Sur-Mer - 02-05-2011
Q1 Julia GlushkoJ. Glushko	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Chiasso - 25-04-2011
R1 Jana CepelovaJ. Cepelova	L	2-6 6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

K. Flipkens Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wimbledon - London - 27-06-2022
R2 Simona HalepS. Halep	L	7-5 6-4	Stats
R1 Jaimee FourlisJ. Fourlis	W	7-5 6-2	Stats
Viking International - Eastbourne - 20-06-2022
R3 Viktoriya TomovaV. Tomova	L	3-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
R2 Elise MertensE. Mertens	W	6-2 2-6 6-1	Stats
R1 Maryna ZanevskaM. Zanevska	W	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

M. Casanova vs K. Flipkens Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Casanova	Stats	K. Flipkens
62.76% (91/54)	YTD Win/Loss	56.38% (495/383)
59.00% (200/139)	Sets Win/Loss	54.28% (1098/925)
53.79% (1705/1465)	Games Win/Loss	51.62% (9667/9060)
53.33% (16/14)	Hard Win/Loss	55.21% (180/146)
67.21% (41/20)	Clay Win/Loss	55.07% (125/102)
64.29% (27/15)	Indoor Hard W/L	56.22% (122/95)
58.33% (7/5)	Grass Win/Loss	62.96% (68/40)
0.01	Aces Per Game	0.17
20	Aces Total	1590
0.03	Double Faults Per Game	0.16
42	Total Double Faults	1440
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
463.61	Average Opponent Rank	498.91
56% (387/689)	1st Serve %	60% (24370/40725)
61% (236/387)	1st Serve Win %	64% (15555/24370)
42% (127/302)	2nd Serve Win %	46% (7585/16352)
50% (40/80)	Break Points Won % (Total)	45% (2080/4582)
46% (301/658)	Return Points Win %	43% (17172/39797)
47.37% (9/10)	Slam W/L	49.17% (59/61)
20.00% (1/4)	Masters W/L	48.18% (53/57)
53.85% (7/6)	Cups W/L	41.18% (14/20)
64.79% (46/25)	Main Tour W/L	55.07% (190/155)
60.00% (9/6)	Challenger W/L	65.91% (174/90)
86.36% (19/3)	Futures W/L	100.00% (5/0)
63% (91/145)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	56% (484/860)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	67% (2/3)
57% (16/28)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	55% (110/201)
63% (31/49)	Deciding Set Win %	58% (163/280)
87% (84/73)	1st Set Won, Won Match	86% (459/397)
13% (84/11)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (459/60)
30% (61/18)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	23% (419/95)